Today's litigious social climate requires an extensive testing regimen of any new product before it is placed on the market. Identifying test compounds that could potentially induce clinical skin irritation is an important step in the product development phase of skin care products. This step is very often performed in animal models such as the rabbit skin irritation test, the maximization test using guinea pigs, the mouse local lymph node assay and the mouse ear swelling test. Because of structural and physiological differences between animal and human skin, the relevance of these methods to the human situation is, however, limited and can lead to misclassification.
Using Tissue Engineered Skin to Eveluate the Irritation Potential of Skin Care Products
July 23, 2009
Fill out my online form.
Most Popular in Animal Alternatives
- 1China Adds 9 More Animal-Free Tests
- 2Global Experts Outline Next-gen, Animal-alternative Cosmetic Test Tenets
- 3China Forms Non-animal Testing Working Group, Appoints IIVS
- 4Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Review of Trends and Perspectives
- 5Oxford Neurosurgeon Supports Animal Testing for Cosmetics
- 6Animal Testing Alternatives Reach China
- 7Microfluidic Testing for LLNA Replacement
- 8Can New Approaches Pave the Way for Better Toxicology?
- 9CeeTox Inches Closer to Validating Non-Animal Skin Allergy Assay
- 10Non-animal Transdermal Diffusion Model Testing for Cosmetic Actives and Formulations
- China Adds 9 More Animal-Free Tests
4/5/2019, Eden Stuart
- China Forms Non-animal Testing Working Group, Appoints IIVS
10/9/2018, Rachel Grabenhofer
- The Body Shop Teams Up with British Lab for Animal-Free Testing
3/7/2019, Eden Stuart
- Global Experts Outline Next-gen, Animal-alternative Cosmetic Test Tenets
1/30/2019, Rachel Grabenhofer