Today's litigious social climate requires an extensive testing regimen of any new product before it is placed on the market. Identifying test compounds that could potentially induce clinical skin irritation is an important step in the product development phase of skin care products. This step is very often performed in animal models such as the rabbit skin irritation test, the maximization test using guinea pigs, the mouse local lymph node assay and the mouse ear swelling test. Because of structural and physiological differences between animal and human skin, the relevance of these methods to the human situation is, however, limited and can lead to misclassification.
Using Tissue Engineered Skin to Eveluate the Irritation Potential of Skin Care Products
July 23, 2009
Fill out my online form.
Most Popular in Animal Alternatives
- 1[updated] Report: EU Parliament Accelerates Plan for Animal Testing Ban
- 2Givaudan Joins Animal-Free Safety Assessment Collaboration
- 3Report: Mexico Bans Animal Testing for Cosmetics
- 4BASF and Givaudan Develop First OECD-Approved Animal Test Alternatives
- 5Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Review of Trends and Perspectives
- 6Industry, NGOs Claim REACH Amendments Could Increase Animal Testing
- 7MSL Solution Providers Tests Microbiological Profile with VeganSure
- 8'Ordinary' French Cosmetics Become the First to Bypass China’s Animal Testing Mandate
- 9Is Mexico Next to Ban Animal Testing?
- 10Is China Ending Pre-market Animal Testing for Cosmetics?
- Industry, NGOs Claim REACH Amendments Could Increase Animal Testing
7/30/2021, Rachel Grabenhofer
- BASF and Givaudan Develop First OECD-Approved Animal Test Alternatives
6/29/2021, Michele Behrens
- 'Ordinary' French Cosmetics Become the First to Bypass China’s Animal Testing Mandate
1/19/2021, Michele Behrens
- MSL Solution Providers Tests Microbiological Profile with VeganSure
8/9/2021, Michele Behrens
- Report: Mexico Bans Animal Testing for Cosmetics
9/3/2021, Jacquelyn Schlabach