This is the fifth article in a series reviewing the metals present in personal care products. Earlier installments appeared in January 1998, Toxic Potential from Metals Absorbed through the Skin (pages 33-42); March 1999, Metals in Personal Care Products, (pages 47-56); August 2000, Chromium, Cobalt, Copper and Iron: Metals in Personal Care Products, (pages 52-65); and August 2001, Lead, Manganese and Mercury: Metals in Personal Care Products, (pages 26-36).
Silver, Titanium and Zirconium: Metals in Cosmetics and Personal-Care Products
August 27, 2009
Fill out my online form.
Most Popular in Biology
- 1P&G, 23andMe Uncover Genetic Ties to Sensitive Skin
- 2Barrier Repair, Healing and Ethnic Variances in Skin: Literature Review
- 3Evoking Emotion: Clean Slate
- 4Skin-stress Connection Key to Dermatoses
- 5Could the Human Virome be the Next Skin Care Target?
- 6Shiseido Puts the 'Pressure' on Anti-aging Skin Care
- 7Defying Damage: Understanding Breakage in Afro-textured Hair
- 8[video] Cosmetics R&D Vlog: Occlusion, Dysbiosis, Virome and More—Changing Skin Needs and Opportunities
- 9Epidermal Evolution: Rhythm, Stress and Touch Response
- 10Comparatively Speaking: Keratinocyte vs. Corneocyte
- Keratin Blend Anchors Follicles and Prevents Pollution-induced Hair Fall
9/25/2019, A.D. Roddick-Lanzilotta, Ph.D., R.J. Kelly, Ph.D., and P.R. Sapsford, Keraplast Manufacturing Ltd., Canterbury, New Zealand