Formulating Water-in-Oil Emulsions: A Scary Endeavor

Oct 17, 2006 | Contact Author | By: Ken Klein, Cosmetech Laboratories
Contact the Author
Save
This item has been saved to your library.
View My Library
(click to close)
Save to My Library
Title: Formulating Water-in-Oil Emulsions: A Scary Endeavor
w/ox o/wx emulsionsx
  • Article

Formulating water-in-oil emulsions is inherently more difficult than oil-inwater emulsions. While there are several reasons for this, probably the most important one is that these emulsions (usually) do not have a clearly defi ned electrical double layer surrounding the emulsion droplets; thus there is a greater likelihood of coalescence. While water-in-oil emulsions have become more popular in the United States in recent years due to their rising popularity in the sunscreen arena, they have enjoyed widespread use in Europe for many years. I have never heard a good explanation for this geographical discrepancy.

I can’t tell you how many times that chemists have told me that the emulsion they made must be water-in-oil since they’“added the water phase into the oil phase!“ This, of course, is nonsense. Another comment I hear is that I have more oil than water in my emulsion, so oil must be the external/continuous phase. More nonsense.

One thing that I have noticed in recent years as we have developed more efficient W/O emulsifiers is that the ratio of oil to water is basically the same whether we have a W/O or O/W emulsion. As a general rule, the amount of water is approximately 60-80%. We should remember that if the internal phase ever exceeds 74%, we no longer have only spherical droplets. The type (O/W or W/O) of emulsion you wind up with is almost entirely dependent on the emulsifier.

Excerpt Only This is a shortened version or summary of the article that appeared in the Oct.1, 2003 issue of Cosmetics & Toiletries magazine. If you would like a copy of the complete article, please contact us at customerservice@cosmeticsandtoiletries.com.