The “Period After Opening” in the Jungle of EU Product Labeling

$$item.publishDate) | Contact Author | By: L. Rigano and N. Lionetti, Rigano Laboratories
Fill out my online form.
This item has been saved to your library.
View My Library
(click to close)
Save to My Library
Title: The “Period After Opening” in the Jungle of EU Product Labeling
regulatory affairsx product labelingx product durabilityx safety testingx testing and instrumentationx 2003/15/ CEx microbial spoilagex
  • Article

Cosmetics durability has always been a burning issue. Because cosmetics are multifunctional products, their durability should be somehow bound to the fading of their complex of aesthetic, skin compatibility and functionality. This approach would be perfect, if simple and unambiguous testing methods for each set of functions were generally agreed between industries and authorities. Lacking that agreement thus far, we find that the adopted defi nition of stability has been vague and precise at the same time, since the date of the first European law on cosmetics.1 “Durability” meant the period during which the product was able to perform its main functions without causing either physiological or microbial harm to the consumer.2 In other words, it referred to durability in terms of both safety and ability to perform. Indeed, it was a very clear and unquestionable definition. Therefore, irrespective of the changing product appearance or a fading scent, a shampoo could be considered stable if it kept its hair detergent activity over time and did not either induce unexpected irritating effects or became microbiologically spoiled or dangerous. 

Excerpt Only This is a shortened version or summary of the article that appeared in the May 1, 2005 issue of Cosmetics & Toiletries magazine. The full content is not currently available online.