Organic Cosmetic Standards: A New Formulation Challenge

July 2, 2007 | Contact Author | By: Tim Kapsner, Aveda Corp.
Close
Fill out my online form.
Save
This item has been saved to your library.
View My Library
(click to close)
Save to My Library
Title: Organic Cosmetic Standards: A New Formulation Challenge
NSF standardsx Ecocertx COPAx organic calculationx allowable chemical processesx
  • Article
  • Keywords/Abstract

Keywords: NSF standards | Ecocert | COPA | organic calculation | allowable chemical processes

Abstract: The popularity of the Ecocert cosmetic standards and the publication of the NSF standards have increased the complexity of the organic cosmetic landscape. This article reviews organic standards in cosmetics and contrasts how to formulate products based on Ecocert vs. NSF standards.

 A vast array of US cosmetic products is being labeled “organic”—from certified organic massage oils to shampoos containing synthetic surfactants and preservatives. The resulting confusion in the marketplace indicates that the organic food industry and the organic cosmetics industry do not know what to think of, or do with, each other. The major organic food markets in the United States, the European Union (EU) and Japan have all struggled with whether—and how to—embrace the emerging cosmetic “stepchild” of organic foods. Regulators in each of these three markets have referred to cosmetics in their organic food programs, but these references have not always helped to clarify the situation. The regulatory answer to the question of using the food standards to certify cosmetics could be paraphrased in each of these markets as follows:

• United States: “Yes you can. No you can’t. OK, I suppose you can.”
• European Union: “Not now, not ever.”
• Japan: “Go ahead—just do not translate it into Japanese.”

To a company entering the organic cosmetics market, the worldwide picture will be overwhelmingly confusing. To an experienced marketer, the worldwide picture also is overwhelmingly confusing.